Influence of Orthognathic Surgery on Velopharyngeal Function in Patients with Cleft Palate

Authors

  • TAKEUCHI Ryoko Division of Reconstructive Surgery for Oral and Maxillofacial Region, Department of Tissue Regeneration and Reconstruction, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author
  • OMINATO Rei Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Health Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author
  • NIIMI Kanae Division of Reconstructive Surgery for Oral and Maxillofacial Region, Department of Tissue Regeneration and Reconstruction, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author
  • NIHARA Jun Division of Orthodontics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author
  • TAKEYAMA Masaki Division of Orthodontics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author
  • SAITO Isao Division of Orthodontics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author
  • KOBAYASHI Tadaharu Division of Reconstructive Surgery for Oral and Maxillofacial Region, Department of Tissue Regeneration and Reconstruction, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan Author

Abstract

Introduction: In orthognathic surgery for cleft palate patients with maxillary undergrowth, it should be carefully planned because maxillary advancement affects velopharyngeal function (VPF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the amount of maxillary advancement in Le Fort I osteotomy affects VPF in cleft palate patients.

Subjects and methods: Six patients with cleft palate who underwent orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2022 were included in this study. VPF was evaluated using a 4-grade based on the cleft palate language test and a nasalance score before and after surgery. The relationship between maxillary advancement and VPF was investigated.

Results: In cases 1 to 4, surgeries were undergone with ideal amounts of maxillary advancement and VPF was not affected after surgeries. In case 5, mild insufficiency grade of VPF suggested that maxillary advancement might affect VPF, but 3 mm of maxillary advancement was planned and performed considering the patient’s chief complaint of improvement of facial appearance. As a result, mild exacerbation of VPF was observed after surgery. In case 6, the preoperative VPF insufficiency was mild, but the articulation disorder was observed. The maxilla was not surgically moved anteriorly, only with canting correction, to preserve speech function. As the result, there was no postoperative deterioration of VPF.

Discussion: In orthognathic surgery for patients with cleft palate, it is necessary to consider the amount of maxillary advancement and formulate a treatment plan from viewpoints of occlusion, VPF, and facial appearance in addition to the patient’s chief complaint.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

Issue

Section

Abstracts from the 15th Joint Meeting of NAOMS and JSOMS

How to Cite

Influence of Orthognathic Surgery on Velopharyngeal Function in Patients with Cleft Palate. (2023). Nepalese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1(1), 30. http://njoms.org.np/index.php/njoms/article/view/24